The United States Agency for International Development (USAID)/Philippines seeks to commissioned SEARCA to conduct an external final performance evaluation of the Protect Wildlife (PW) Activity. The evaluation shall serve the following purposes: (1) to validate PW’s Theory of Change (ToC), programmatic assumptions and implementing strategies; and (2) to document and measure PW’s actual outputs (deliverables) and outcomes (key results).
Purpose of the Evaluation
Final performance evaluation is deemed important as the Protect Wildlife Activity draws to a close. The evaluation results could help inform similar natural resource conservation activities currently or in the future, contribute to the growing body of evidence on good practices and a better understanding of the enabling and hindering factors in biodiversity conservation and anti-wildlife trafficking.
Lessons from the Activity may also have particular utility to ongoing programs of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) of the Philippines and may also be of importance to USAID E3/Forestry and Biodiversity Office, USAID contractors, and the broader biodiversity conservation and forestry community including donors, civil society organizations, academe, and the private sector (USAID request for quotation, 2020).
Evaluation Questions
The evaluation will focus primarily on validating PWA’s theory of change (ToC), programmatic assumptions and implementing strategies as well as document and measure the actual outputs (deliverables) and outcomes (key results). To achieve this, the evaluation will provide empirical answers to the following key research queries:
KEY EVALUATION QUESTIONS |
What is the context against which the theory has been formulated? |
What are the hypothesis of causality? |
What are the assumptions and their factual basis? |
What are the evidences to support the theory? |
Is the theory plausible, testable and meaningful? |